Archive | June, 2009

OnlineBootyCall.com review

OnlineBootyCall.com review

Quick Summary:


Hookup potential: 3/5 Features: 4/5 Design: 4/5 Content: 3/5

  • Seems to have a decent base of “real” users, although profiles are fairly content-lite
  • Straightforward and clean design
  • Some fun features, including “Rate Booty

The Full Story:

One of the first things that I try to assess when I’m reviewing an adult dating website is how “authentic” the site’s membership base is. Sure, it’s fun to look at naked pictures of hot models, but you know most of those profiles are spam, shill accounts, or bots dressed up to artificially inflate the site’s social proof statistics. And looking at porn online is fine, but you’re there because you want to hook up, right?

Well, when it came time to review to Online Booty Call, I was pleasantly surprised. The member’s homepage gets right to the point of the site – finding booty calls. Everything’s laid out clearly for you when you log in: booty requests, messaging system, online booty calls, and, of course, the pièce de résistance – random booty. There’s also a search option to the right, which lets you determine a prospective booty call’s proximity to you.

One thing I noticed immediately was that the random booty calls are not so random. Results are always confined to within your stated area. A small thing, but I appreciated it. I mean, imagine seeing an oh-so-hot random booty, only to find out that she’s in the opposite coast. That would suck, right?

One thing I didn’t like, though, were the sparse profile pages. Sure, there are a couple of photos, and maybe an uploaded music clip. There’s basic info on height, weight, age, orientation, and the like, but the About Me is almost always empty. This is supposed to be the profile’s “calling card,” no? And a way for members to filter according to their preferences; but when you look at a lot of them, they’re empty. I won’t put all the blame on the members. I mean there’s here’s hardly anything in my profile, either–I signed up for an account, and when it didn’t FORCE me to fill anything in, I didn’t.

I think it probably relates to the site being relatively new, so they’re trying to lower the barrier for entry to new members. I disagree with the policy in terms of the effect on the user experience, though–there should be more required questions or fields, such as about what a person likes or dislikes, what’s he or she is looking for, etc. This way, when I browse through my booty call prospects, I can filter them based on more information, instead of just deciding on one’s booty worthiness via a (let’s-face-it-usually-deceptive) photo or two. Why waste time on someone you can’t even get any mileage out of, right?

The Rate Booty section is something that really amused me. Sometimes, I’d log in not even looking for a hot date. I just want to rate people.

The design and layout of Online Booty Call is really pleasing to the eyes. I like that it’s clean. No gaudy banners, no awful animation. Navigation is easy and everything’s organized neatly. It is hard to get lost here. There was one thing I found counter intuitive, though: my booty invites. I sent a couple of booty invites to people I found in my searches. And for the life of me I can’t seem to find those invites anywhere. They’re not in the Booty Requests page under “Sent”. They are nowhere to be found. Now, I suppose that I’d have to wait till they accept my booty invite before I see them in my Booty Call page. But I think there should be a way to “follow up” or something. Plus, what if I want to see whom I’ve sent invites to so I won’t accidentally do it again?

Overall however, I liked Online Booty Call. It’s user friendly, genuine, and I think I’ll be able to find a decent playdate or two in there. Profile content may be lacking for now, but perhaps once the membership is large enough there’ll be more; especially if the service really takes off. For now, it is obvious that the site owners are keen on just populating their member database. (There’s even a sweepstakes going on right now–the number one member referrer wins!)

Give it a shot.

Posted in Reviews23 Comments

Dating Coach

Dating Coach

Oh God. I just found this over at Evan Marc Katz’s blog and it SLEW me. Seriously, I don’t like to bag on the “seduction community” guys, but this is a hilarious satirical send-up of their culture. Enjoy.

Posted in Fun9 Comments

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Top 10 links for week beginning 06/28/2009

  1. Why bonobos make bad role models
  2. Sexist beatdown: the caveman rapists among us edition
  3. 9 ways to ruin sex (like you need help)
  4. Rape fantasies and hygiene by state
  5. Caught jerking it in the library. Hot.
  6. Gay exorcism video (wtf?)
  7. I don’t even… what?
  8. Burger King sexual innuendo win
  9. How geeks get sex
  10. Peasant superstition, alive and well in Africa

Posted in Fun, News2 Comments

Interview with Mike/Weasel from “Why Women Hate Men” and “Psychotic Letters From Men”

Interview with Mike/Weasel from “Why Women Hate Men” and “Psychotic Letters From Men”

Part of my job is to promote this site by commenting on the at-least-peripherally-dating-related blogs of other people. It recently occurred to me that it might be a good idea to contact the people whose blogs I visit and ask them if they’d be interested in doing interviews. I’m curious about the lives and thoughts of the people who write the blogs I read, and it seemed reasonable to presume that others are, too. And I figured, you know, free publicity isn’t the least appetizing metaphorical carrot in the world.

So I dutifully emailed them all, and to my utmost shock and horror, more than a couple of them didn’t write back to tell me to fall down an abandoned mine shaft and die in fear and agony. The first of those individuals sufficiently indulgent as to grant my request for an interview was Mike/Weasel, who writes the blogs Why Women Hate Men and Psychotic Letters From Men, both of which, seriously, you need to read if you’re even remotely interested in laughing until your eyes are bleeding and your lungs collapse and your ribs puncture your internal organs and you drown in your own bile and pus and phlegm and effluent.

Here’s how it went:

Hey Mike. Let me just start by thanking you for your time. I can see from your web output alone that you must be obscenely busy, so I really appreciate this interview.

First question: What’s the story behind the handle “Weasel”?

That’s an easy one, and people will probably groan at it.

I joined a fraternity while in college at Arizona State University. Most, if not all, fraternities actually have “naming” ceremonies much like the famous scene from the movie “Animal House.”

I was bequeathed with the nickname “Weasel.”

Not only did it immediately stick within my fraternity, but it stuck campus-wide.

In fact, it stuck so much that eventually I didn’t even respond to “Mike”. I was introduced to others as “Weasel”, and I eventually just introduced myself as “Weasel.” It really stuck out, people always remembered it, so I just kept it and made it my own.

It was funny, because you could have placed 100 ASU students, including my closest friends, in front of me and asked if any of them knew my real name, and you’d undoubtedly receive 100 dumb, blank stares. Followed by some brave soul saying “Isn’t it Weasel?”

The name stuck after college amongst my close friends, and many still use it today. I love it.

But I’m in my 30s now, so when I meet new people, I’ve decided it’s best to go back to Mike.

Your sites (Psychotic Letters From Men and Why Women Hate Men) have at the heart of their humor the ridiculing of men. What inspired you to choose men as the prime satirical target of your online writing?

Honestly, it just came along by chance.

After looking at a variety of blogs, I realized I could best get my comedy writing out there by blasting readers with short, satirical comedy pieces. So I just needed a subject.

At the time, many people in my circle of friends were doing the online dating thing, and I heard absolutely endless stories from my female friends about how fucking awful the guys were online. Truly, unbelievably awful. You can not possibly imagine the things I’ve seen.

And then it just kind of hit me.

Here’s a subject- sex and relationships- that everybody is interested in. And the personal ads guys were posting were just … I can’t even explain it, it simply defies words how horrible they were. In fact, one of biggest problems I had initially was getting my readers to even believe they were actual personal ads rather than just part of my comedy writing.

So I started WWHM, a collection of posts every few days that featured really bad men’s personal ads, followed by my critical, and (hopefully, at times) humorous analysis.

And I felt no guilt at skewering these guys, because guys deserve it. They put in so little effort into actually understanding what women actually want and need from a man, and instead either a.) frame everything from their own porn-polluted male point of view about women, b.) post personal ads that unintentionally reflect nothing but their their own selfish, immature needs, or c.) have no qualms baring their utter hatred of women, yet still expect women to find them attractive.

And don’t get me wrong about “porn-polluted.” I love porn as much as the next guy, but porn is a simply a visual depiction of our fantasies about females, and has absolutely nothing to do with the reality about how women think and feel about men in the real world.

Women function on a completely different level than men, and to appeal to women you have to take the time to understand what truly motivates them to find you as an attractive partner- and believe me, it’s never, EVER, a picture of your cock. A cock is a means to an end, not a means to a beginning.

So basically, I call men out on their lack of effort in understanding women, and their ridiculous sense of entitlement when it comes to sex.

As for Psychotic Letters, that just landed in my lap as an offshoot of WWHM. The hypocrisy of men calling women “psycho bitches” all the time never ceases to amaze me. Guys are just as bad, if not worse.

I have to read and comment on quite a few blogs for promotional reasons, but yours rank among the very few I read purely for pleasure. To me, your writing seems effortlessly brilliant and completely hysterical, yet I see on your companion blog it takes you 10 hours to do three posts. What’s your process for writing? What do you find the most difficult part? The most enjoyable?

This is embarrassing, but I’ll be honest. Nowadays, each WWHM post takes between 15 and 20 hours to write because I’m so meticulous about every single word. Psycho Letters posts take about 6-8 hours until I’m happy with it. I know that seems like a long time, but I put a lot of work into each. Writers know what I’m talking about; the final draft rarely looks anything like the first.

I usually pick an ad or letter sent in by a reader several days in advance and mull it over. I come up with a few jokes and jot them down. Then I assemble them into a dialogue that hopefully has an ounce of flow to it, which is always the hardest part and the part I don’t enjoy. Then I weed out the jokes that don’t work and whittle it down to a post. I re-write them over and over until I feel it flows ok and it’s at least a little bit funny. I add jokes as I write, which are usually the best ones.

I know when I’ve nailed a good post, which is extremely rare. That’s solely the reason I find writing enjoyable, when I know I’ve absolutely hit a home run. But 95% of the time, I produce a complete bomb. Ironically, my readers seem to like the bombs, while my “home runs” rarely do well.

I wish I could write these things in an hour, but I can’t. And like most writers, I absolutely abhor what I write. I post entries, and I never read them again, because I can’t. I’m my own worst critic. They just seem so fucking awful, so unfunny. As my readers frequently point out to me, I completely try too hard and overwrite everything. I’m trying to fix that, and desperately need an editor to help me figure out how to become a better writer.

Augusten Burroughs often admits he feels like a complete fraud, and that someday someone will figure out he has no writing talent whatsoever; I feel the exact same way every day. I don’t say that for pity or re-assurance, that’s just honestly how I feel. It won’t change. My work completely disgusts me.

I’ve found writing WWHM more enjoyable lately as I focus more on honest reflections of my own tragic sexual experiences as they relate to the day’s selected personal ad. I plan on continuing this, and I’m not sure how my readers will react. It feels too self-important, but it also feels like where I need to go with WWHM to keep myself involved in the writing. I have to check my ego at the door and admit to, and be honest about, my worst transgressions in life. While it’s painful to do so, it’s tragically funny.

I notice that there’s no advertising on either of your blogs. Do you have any plans to commercialize/monetize them in the future, or are you happy having them serve only as a place for you to showcase and refine your talent, and to attract “offline” work offers? Do you get many work offers through the blogs? Do you think running advertising on them would alienate your readership?

I’m not a guy driven by money. I’m only driven by truly funny writing, and entertaining my readers.

I’ve looked into monetizing both blogs, but the money rarely seems worth it to me. On an average day right now I get about 10-15,000 page views, so I’d probably only pull in about $150-200 a month anyway, if that. On the days when I get 40,000+ readers however, I think to myself “What am I, stupid?”

I just want my readers to come back and enjoy my sites. I want to know they laughed at something I wrote. I don’t want to pound them with ads. If they leave my sites in a better mood than they came in, I’ve done my job. That’s what I strive for. In fact, thats what I live for. If my writing is good enough, it will pay off in the end, and I don’t need to worry about cashing in now.

I get some work offers, but very few worth pursuing. Mostly, I get people wanting me to promote their products on my website, which I won’t do. Yes, it’s selfish perhaps, but I only promote my own writing on my website. I’ve worked hard to get where I am, and I need to work harder to get where I need to go.

Ultimately, I want to achieve two things from my websites:

Yes, I want a book deal. Yeah, I know, who fucking doesn’t? But the more I grow my audience, the better chance I have of securing one. I’ve only sent my stuff to two agents, and was soundly rejected by both. Obviously I need help in marketing myself, but I’m still trying to figure it out as I go.

Secondly, I want to write spot comedy for TV along the lines of Talk Soup, The Daily Show, a late night talk show, or something like that new show from Daniel Tosh. I have been contacted about a few opportunities, but nothing has come to fruition as of yet. That’s something I know I can do and do well. Something I’m 100% certain I will end up doing. I hope to move to LA soon, but I’ve been saying that for a while now.

I see from your online bio that you solicit for jobs writing “website or blog copy, promotional marketing, speechwriting, and tele-play or screenplay rewrites/ punch-up.” Do you have anything you’re working on or that you’ve published in any of those areas that you’d like to take this opportunity to tell us about?

No, nothing I’d be willing to share these days, lol.

I’ve written many spec comedy scripts, and had a sitcom I wrote called “24″ produced and shot in Seattle many years ago. What happened to that show I’ll never know because I was pretty much fired, which I fully deserved. At the time, I was much more dedicated to destroying myself with drugs and alcohol than any opportunity to better my life. I regret it to this day, but I’ve moved on.

I’ve started a few screenplays, which of course I’ve never finished. I would like to revisit one in particular, but I never have time. We’ll see. I have to focus on my websites now, as it seems to be my best avenue for recognition.

I’ve got some web copy here and there on the web, but nothing interesting enough to share whatsoever. Typical corporate bullshit.

Last question: what do you think you’d be doing for a living if you weren’t a writer?

I could not imagine doing anything else, ever.

I am simply not qualified to do anything else, and I write not because I want to necessarily (believe me, most of the time I DON’T want to write), but rather because I absolutely have to. I react to everything by writing about it, whether I’m just writing to myself or for the enjoyment of others. I can’t explain it sufficiently, but I have an innate need to write, just like my my desire for food, water and sex. If I think it, I write it.

I guess I originally saw myself as a lawyer or some type of corporate business monkey, but after working in banking, advertising, and the casino industry, I realized I hated them all with a passion regardless of how much they paid me. You can’t pay me enough to rob me of enjoying my life or feeling good about myself. The corporate world of ass-kissing, lies, self-important and meaningless business jargon, and the wholesale destruction of everything creative, constructive and interesting sickened me.

If the economy wasn’t so bad, I’d encourage everybody to strike out on their own and try to make a difference in the world rather than slaving to some bland, self-serving, dickhead fucking mega-corporation.

It’s risky, but at least I found I could truly look myself in the mirror when I woke up in the morning.

Thanks so much Janak!

Hah, wow. Thank you, Mike! I would have been happy with a paragraph response to each question, and here we are 2000+ words later. Beyond generous. The best of luck with your future projects and ambitions. Keep ‘em laughing.

As mentioned at the beginning of this post, a few other intrepid souls have expressed interest in doing an interview, so this will be a quasi-regular series for a while. I’m not sure who’s going to be up next week (whoever responds first!), but I look forward to finding out.

Stay saucy!

Posted in Fun, Interviews11 Comments

Ashley Madison Review

Ashley Madison Review

Quick Summary:


Hookup potential: 4/5 Features: 3/5 Design: 5/5 Content: 4/5

  • Straight-up dating agency for people looking for affairs and casual relationships
  • Direct and to the point. You get a slew of profiles when you search according to proximity, and none of them seem fake.
  • Simple, functional design. Just what you need and nothing else.

The Full Story:

This is a nice, easy website for people looking to hook up locally, particularly if it’s for an extra-marital tryst. Ashley Madison’s concept is “a dating agency online”. After logging in, the main options presented are to: open your mail, update your profile, or search for profiles. There are no bothersome ads, no link to this and that. There isn’t even any of the harping cams and videos upsell advertising that many adult dating websites have.

What you see is what you get. Take the search for example. You can do a simple or advanced search. With advanced search, you can filter for fields. You can remove the “attached” people from your results page, if you are only looking for singles, or you can search for them exclusively, if you’re after the thrill of a fling.

Your search results in a list of profiles. You will see the basics elements of the profiles there, such as picture, location, age, what they’re looking for, and their current relationship status. For each result, you’ll see if the person’s online or not. You have an option to immediately chat with those online, if the person isn’t online you can message her or send her an online gift using credit points, which you purchase—a slightly different model than the subscription one used by most site. (A good model, we think—you only pay for what you use.) Profiles also have a private “showcase” link; you will only see the photos in here if you have permission from the showcase owner.

And that’s it. That’s basically the website.

Ashley Madison boasts a higher success rate in terms of hookups and affairs instigated than most other sites; the lack of community chat, webcams, and porn may be the main reasons why. Contact here is one-on-one, focused, personal, and direct. People here know what they want and are determined to get it.

For example, when you send a gift, there’s a standard flirty note there, and a field where you can add your own message. You are discouraged from sending random gifts to random people, because every gift you send costs you credits. When you “wink” at someone, you need to let them know what your wink means. There’s practically no way to avoid getting straight to the point. When you find someone and contact them you’re almost forced to let them know right away what you’re after. To me, that’s how an adult dating site should work. No games.

As for the design, the website is easy to navigate. Your standard links are those to your email, the profile search, and the links to update your profile or account. There’s no confusion as to where you’d need to go.

When you need to contact someone on your search results, you just go into their profiles, and chat, message, or give a gift. These are the only interaction allowed within this dating service, and it’s enough.

Like the site itself, the design is functional, straightforward, and clean – the only thing that bugged me visually was the “100% Affair Guaranteed” banner.

This banner promotes a paid service of the site (it’s an upsell). For almost $300, Ashley Madison Agency guarantees that you’ll hook up with someone when you use their website – so long as you undertake to chat with someone, message someone, and give gifts to someone a certain number of times per month for three months. Failure to do so voids the guarantee. You don’t get anything extra with this – it’s just a guarantee. Unless you’re a real troglodyte I’m pretty sure you’d be able to achieve the same result without the guarantee.

The thing is the banner is shoved in your face every time you load a page. Literally, they show the banner every time they get a chance. And it’s not like you can just click on the banner to close it, or choose to hide it. It stays there until you move to another page. It starts to feel irritating and intrusive.

I guess nothing’s perfect. Overall however, the Ashley Madison Agency seems on to a winner, though, and represents real innovation in the space. You might not be able to do better for your buck.

Posted in Reviews14 Comments

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Top 10 links for week beginning 06/21/2009

  1. Penis: the True Story
  2. Russian woman on trial for raping 10 men
  3. Girl in intensive care after restoring virginity 6 times
  4. Pegging: what is it and how do you do it
  5. Kinky sex taking off; Internet blamed
  6. A very unfortunate claim to immortality
  7. Wedding canceled after bride makes unfortunate discovery
  8. Bitter much? [VID]
  9. Sex addiction: genuine medical condition or lame excuse for being a bastard?
  10. “Stop killing mosquitoes with your penis.”

Posted in Fun, News4 Comments

Our submission to trollcats.com

Our submission to trollcats.com

I came across trollcats.com the other day through their twitter account and found it hysterical. The concept appears to be that you combine a “trollish” statement with a lolcat-like picture.

Inspired, I made my own “righteous sex-positive fist-pumpers” trollcat (see below!) and decided to send it in, not really expecting anything. To my surprise they posted it on the 18th. Check it! I AM LIKE, INTERNET FAMOUS.

Posted in Fun5 Comments

Internet porn – the plague that is SWEEPING THE EARTH!(@*#!@#$!&@#

Internet porn – the plague that is SWEEPING THE EARTH!(@*#!@#$!&@#

HALP! SAVE US! THE INTERNET PORNS HAVE THE DESTRUCTIVE POWER OF A BOMB!

Posted in Fun2 Comments

XXXblackbook.com review

XXXblackbook.com review

Quick Summary:


Hookup potential: 3/5 Features: 3/5 Design: 4/5 Content: 3/5

  • Hook-up website slanted towards voyeurs and exhibitionists
  • Clean, user-friendly design
  • Fast video upload and download
  • Nice video chat

The Full Story:

My first impression of XXXblackbook.com was that it’s for voyeurs and exhibitionists. People who like to share their kinky interests with the whole class and people who like to watch and listen.

The video chat is a good example. There are several rooms to join, depending on the topic (or kind of people) that interest you. Since the automatic setting is for video chat, it tries to turn on your microphone and camera as soon as you log in (a minor annoyance–I don’t like pushy software). Plenty of people in the video chatrooms have both on and some of them are busy masturbating for your amusement: mostly guys, though I saw a couple of woman busy at it too. Also notable is the “Erotica” option under your personal profile. This allows you to write and share your own erotic stories. Most of the ones I read were more porn-y than “my eyes locked on his engorged member as it bobbed about like a fern frond,” though that’s what I expected from a predominantly male membership. XXXblackbook.com also offers a personal video upload option. Again, most of the videos are pretty graphic home-made sex videos.

Anyway, assuming you do find someone interesting on the site whom you want to contact, you can send mail, chat live or send a flirt. A flirt is one of those “nudge” type feature. You don’t have to think of anything original, just choose one from the dropdown menu. Cute.

I did encounter one difficulty here, though. When you see that someone is online, you need to go into their profile in order to contact them by mail, flirt or chat. The thing is that the Chat Live and Send IM buttons are next to each other. I checked both out myself and was sent to the Video Chat rooms when I clicked on Chat Live. I was like, “Okay – so where’s the girl?” I was forced to click on the back arrow of the browser to get to the girl’s profile page again.

I did really like the search options. There are basic, advanced and perfect search options. The basic’s good enough when you’re just looking for someone who’s online, and not necessary someone to hook up with for real. Unlike other dating sites that I’ve seen, the result pages are neat and do not have a cluttered, ‘too busy’ feel to them. There’s enough white space that you feel you can ‘breathe’, visually. A nice touch also is that more information about people is provided when you mouseover, including how many photos they have, what their rating is, and what kind of a partner they’re looking for.

The video quality of both video uploads and video chat is commendable. The graphics are clear while not being so high-res that it affects the streaming speed. There’s strange background noise on the video chat room sometimes though, even when switching between one video and another. It’s weird, but it doesn’t always come on. Someone in one of the chat rooms told me that it was some hacker trying to bug the hell out of the chatters, which seemed unlikely.

Overall, I’d describe the site as neat and functional. Though they’ve already amassed a sizable membership it doesn’t feel as though they’ve compromised the visuals and space as a consequence. I did find the ads troublesome sometimes. Do they have to be animated? Really? I felt they often detracted away from the simple ‘classic’ feel of the site. Having a looped animation of jiggling boobs and cock sucking going on while you’re trying to read some woman’s erotica page, can be downright irritating.

But this is one dating site I’d come back to, even when I’m not up for hookups or whatever. They’ve clearly put a lot of effort into trying to make the site a place you’d like to hang out, even when you’re not on the prowl. On the video chat, for example, there’s usually a group of people playing strip Texas holdem up poker. And over in the next chat room, a group of older men and women are playing trivial pursuit–albeit fully clothed. So, the “adult” fun here is not all naughty and kinky. I met some really cool people during the few weeks I spent here; and arranged a “play date” to boot.

Worth a go.

Posted in Reviews26 Comments

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Top 10 links for week beginning 06/14/2009

  1. Sex laws: screwing the American people
  2. 16 porn stars test positive for HIV
  3. 10 things you don’t know about women
  4. Why men prefer direct pick-up lines
  5. Taking the teeth out of oral sex
  6. The best picture on Wiki award goes to…
  7. The human sex map, pin what you’ve done!
  8. Abstention from masturbation experiment
  9. Women more promiscuous and less faithful than men
  10. Jam your promise ring up your ass

Posted in Fun, News6 Comments

Adult Friend Finder geodensity fail

Adult Friend Finder geodensity fail

The below image (click for full size view) was sent in by one of our New Zealand readers, found after he followed an Adult Friend Finder link. Our reader points out that while Kiwis might enjoy aquatic pursuits, very few of them choose to actually live IN the ocean.

Adult friend finder geodensity fail

Posted in Fun, Your Stories2 Comments

Bondage.com review

Bondage.com review

Quick Summary:


Hookup potential: 4/5 Features: 4/5 Design: 4/5 Content: 5/5

  • The Internet’s most popular “dating” website for the Fetish and BDSM community.
  • Packed with features and a thriving, active membership.
  • Attractive and niche-appropriate design.

The Full Story:

The diversity of the BDSM community forever amazes me. Yoking together a community this heterogeneous is no mean task, but for my $19.95 bondage.com seems to have come closer than any other similar site to doing so. Frankly, I doubt any other BDSM or fetish website exists with the number of members, resources, and user facilities that bondage.com can boast.

I signed up for a premium account, logged in, and decided to begin by assuming the role of someone looking for a “play date.” One of the more useful and interesting features you’ll initially encounter after signing up is the BDSM checklist. The idea being that you can check off everything you’ve done and grade your experience (on a Loved it->Hated It continuum.) This way, anyone browsing through profiles can know instantly if you have “play chemistry” with them–you can also email your checklist internally or externally to others to prep them for your BDSM preferences before deciding whether to meet or not. Even if people browsing your profile don’t physically refer to the checklist, the website will do it for them automatically and offer them an instant compatibility rating. Another nice feature for casual profile browsing is the reply rating–it’ll let you know how often members you’re viewing respond to email (or indeed, if they respond at all.) It’d be a great time-saver if other dating sites had this feature.

I found the A/V chat feature a bit off-putting. It took quite a while to load and had an “obviously third party software” feel (the design has not been integrated into bondage.com’s distinctive look). Plus, once you get it up, it does its level best to turn on your microphone and camera for you. What if I just wanted vanilla text chat? Just sound? Just video? It seemed needlessly anxious to be exclusionary. Pushy software that always thinks it knows best is a real pet peeve of mine (Microsoft Word should be consigned eternally to the Stygian depths.) Anyway, after text-chatting with some of the members for a bit, I shut it down and went to another page. There wasn’t much going on in the room, anyway. The A/V chat has only one room and isn’t organized according to topic. The administrators seemed kind of heavy, too. No insults or bad language on an adult dating website? We’re not 12-year-olds, people–how about you let us decide how we’re going to interact with each other?

The forums seem to be a better way to start quickly interacting with the community and making connections. I noticed that some topics were getting a lot of hits, particularly those in the humor section of the forum. After posting and responding a bit I realized that it was a lot of fun. Full of flirty exchanges and journeys into comical sarcasm.

Another way to get into the community is through the groups section. I guess they’re like a kinkier version of Yahoo or Usenet Groups, only you get to post personal ads in them too. I joined “Learning the Ropes”. Each group is given its own discussion forum–they’re often disappointing, though. The first one I joined, for example, had active posts but the only topic was “Introductions”. I was left thinking “Okay, well. I’m new here but I’m sure I can manage to engage people beyond a basic meet-and-greet introduction.”  The group “Humiliation & Degradation R US” was one of the better groups I explored; it seemed very active and popular, and members had a range of topics available for discussion. All groups are user-created by premium members. I think it wouldn’t be a terrible idea for the bondage.com operators to step in and try to provide a bit more moderation and content for the groups feature. After all, it is these discussions that help to make the website “sticky”.

I stand in open admiration of the effort put into the creation of the site. Like I said, it has pretty much everything a serious BDSM practitioner might need and its pragmatic, attractive, and functional design is organized logically and intuitively. they make it easy to filter and tailor the site to provide the experiences you want to have on it. You can effortlessly switch between interacting with groups, individuals, or just trolling about on your lonesome enjoying videos, stories, blogs, and so on.

One thing aside from the A/V chat which did bug me was the “shopping” section of the site. As Bondage.com does not sell its own physical merchandise it uses affiliate plugins to facilitate kink-related purchases. This means that sometimes when you decide to check out details of items, you are redirected to an offsite merchant page, losing your bondage.com connection while you shop and with no links to quickly get you back home. These links should really open in new windows.

Anyway, this is a minor glitch and wouldn’t stop me from recommending the website to anyone involved in the BDSM lifestyle, or who is curious about exploring it. A-. Good job.

Posted in Reviews9 Comments

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Weekly Roundup – Top 10 Casual Sex Links from Around the Web

Top 10 links for week beginning 06/07/2009

  1. Is there a safe way to attempt autoerotic asphyxiation?
  2. Department of Homeland Security’s guide to online sex ad acronyms
  3. wikiporno.org is here. Hoorah.
  4. Explanations for women’s sexual experiences
  5. Being altruistic may make you attractive
  6. The seedy sexual side of high fashion modeling exposed
  7. How to become a dirty old man
  8. Life’s tough for Amsterdam’s pimps
  9. Abstinence is not realistic says Palin’s daughter
  10. Polygamy is no fun, claims Ethiopian man with 11 wives

Posted in Fun, News2 Comments

Kind of a neat craigslist tale on the topic of “honesty in dating”

Kind of a neat craigslist tale on the topic of “honesty in dating”

I found this story posted on craigslist. It makes some interesting points about honesty in relationships and gender politics. Plus it’s fucking hilarious.

My Excellent Adventure with “Table for Six”

Seeing no signs of progress some five years after my divorce, and with my 42nd birthday rapidly approaching, my well-meaning but misguided friends chipped in together to buy me a membership in a single’s club called “Table for Six.”

The format, as explained in a welcoming letter I received from the agency, seemed simple enough: you attend a dinner for three couples at a fancy restaurant; if you click with someone, you were free to arrange additional dates on your own, or by matchmaking through the agency. The members of the group seated at the table with me had been selected by the agency for compatibility: fortyish, well-to-do professionals all, and each of us divorced at least once. As luck would have it, the third man in the group had failed to show up, so distributed around the table with me were the other man, three women (all reasonably attractive specimens in my eyes), and a facilitator, whose role was to keep the conversation moving along amongst the group. “Remember, honesty is very important!” she chirped, managing to sound both serious and merry at the same time. “I encourage you all to consider it a rule, and not to embroider the truth!” I didn’t really want to be here to begin with – this being exactly the type of contrived social event I loathe – so being lectured to in this way was particularly irritating. I swirled a watery vodka and tonic and wondered why I had agreed to be here at all.

Having finished her lecture, the facilitator announced that everyone would be introducing themselves and giving a short biographical sketch, and gestured to me to begin. I gave everyone sixty seconds of whom I am, and then took inventory of my companions as they did the same.

Teresa, who was sitting closest to me, was smartly dressed in a black skirt and a white blazer. She smiled coyly beneath wavy blond hair and watery blue eyes, and her florid complexion suggested that she liked to pull a cork now and then.

Janet sat stiffly between Teresa and the facilitator. The cream turtleneck that rose out from her dark jacket fit her like a neck brace, and her expression gave me the feeling that she considered this get-together to be very serious business.

Hunched over to the right of the facilitator was the other man. He was already working on his second drink, and I had the urge to lean across the table and loosen the knot in his tie. He stammered his way through a short introduction and then looked to his right.

Slouched there, at the other end of the group, was Kaitlin, who was as relaxed as Janet was not. She seemed intelligent enough when she spoke, but somewhat lacking in self-confidence. The most casually dressed member of the group, and wore a minimum amount of makeup. Her peasant dress was simple and elegant; her chestnut-brown hair short and shapeless.

With the introductions completed, the facilitator asked if everyone was ready to order and waved at the waiter passing through the room. Kaitlin, I observed, ordered vegetarian. But it would hardly have mattered if she ordered the filet mignon and lobster platter; in the time-honoured feminine tradition of trying to make a good first impression on the first date, none of the women did more than pick at their food.

The conversation sputtered a few times in the beginning, but gradually took hold. Terrorism, the economy, the housing market…all the predictable topics were discussed in a predictably superficial, non-offensive manner. Unfortunately, the other man was not proving to be much of a conversationalist, and the burden fell to me to pick up the slack. Twice I deflected questions about my opinions on social topics, and twice the facilitator cheerily reminded me that honesty was very important, and that I should consider it a rule. The vodka I had consumed wanted to know if I was going to continue to put up with that shit, and I decided that I would not.

“Look, just because I don’t take you into my thoughts on every point we discuss doesn’t mean that I’m being less than honest.”

For a brief moment, the facilitator seemed nonplussed. Clearly, she was not accustomed to having her concept of honesty brought into question. Then the cheery smile she’d been sporting throughout the evening found its way back onto her face, and she smoothed it into place with a short laugh. “But Dan, we’re all trying to learn about each other tonight so that we can get acquainted. We can’t do that if you’re holding back things about yourself. We want to know the real Dan. Won’t you help us with that?”

I turned my palms toward the ceiling. “You’re talking about candor – or transparency if you prefer – which is not the same as honesty. Honesty is telling the truth about the things you choose to say, while providing enough detail to be representative of reality.” But the facilitator had decided to be preoccupied with trying to flag down a waiter, and she did not reply to this. I looked around the table, hoping that someone would argue with me, or agree with me, or tell me to take a flying leap – anything, in short, to escape the perfunctory conversation we’d been having for the past hour.

The waiter arrived and began clearing the table and taking drink orders. Teresa turned towards me and rested her hand on the back of her neck, leaning forward to pivot her elbow on the table. “So, Dan,” she said, smiling broadly, “When was your last long-term relationship?” I decided that I’d had enough of watery vodka and tonics and ordered a Remy Martin instead.

“A couple of years ago or so.” I wondered when we would start to discuss the weather, and whether I could escape to the men’s room after finishing the Remy for a leisurely, lengthily interlude, fake an upset stomach upon my return, and leave early.

“How did you meet her?” Teresa had taken a liking to me, or so it seemed to me.

Knowing the forsaken path ahead of us in this line of conversation, I paused and thought for a moment. Honesty is very important – we’re all trying to learn about each other tonight! So I shrugged, looked Teresa in the eye, and gave her honesty.

“I picked her up at a strip club. She was a dancer.”

Teresa laughed heartily. “Really!” she exclaimed a bit too loudly, and chuckled again.

“Really,” I replied quietly, not laughing or smiling.

Teresa fingered her drink, apparently trying to think of what to say next. “How long did you go out?” she finally asked.

“A little over a year. Maybe fifteen months.”

“Why did you break up, because she was a stripper?” Teresa had stopped laughing and now looked slightly concerned. Some of the other people at the table had stopped talking and were leaning in, trying to hear the conversation.

“No. She wanted to get married, and I didn’t.”

“Oh,” said Teresa in a small voice. The waiter had come back, and she traded him her empty glass for a full one. A slice of pineapple hung from the rim. “You didn’t want to marry a stripper?”

“No, stripping had nothing to do with it.” I took my Remy from the waiter and nodded a thank you.

“Didn’t it bother you?

I buried my nose in the snifter containing the Remy and inhaled deeply. My nostrils tingled. “Stripping? No.”

“Don’t strippers also accept money for sex?”

The other man at the table was watching me now, and for the first time since the evening began, he seemed to be enjoying himself. I lowered my glass and swirled the cognac around. “You’re confusing stripping with hooking,” I replied.

“Same difference,” Teresa said evenly. Her lips had begun to tighten and disappear. I shrugged again and took a healthy swig from the snifter.

“Do you go to strip clubs often?” Teresa’s voice had sharpened, and she seemed much less interested in me now.

I puffed air from my mouth, feeling the Remy slide down to my stomach and igniting the flesh along the way. “How many times a week is often?”

Teresa’s mouth flapped open and closed a couple of times, and then she raised her own glass and sipped furiously at the straws.

Janet turned in my direction. “What is the attraction with strippers?” she asked stiffly.

I could see the facilitator trying to look at me around the curve of Janet’s turtleneck sweater. I looked back at Janet and said, “They generally have little problem with getting naked.”

“Do you pay them for sex?”

I raised my glass and took another large sip. “Sometimes. Sometimes not. Depends on the girl, the day, the mood.”

One of Teresa’s hands held her glass in the air, and the other was buried in her armpit. “Do you also see hookers?” she asked with sarcastic joviality.
I returned my gaze to Teresa. Her cheeks were much redder now. “Street girls, no. Escorts, yes.”

“Why?” asked Janet with feeling.

“Convenience, honesty, reliability. And they go home afterwards.”

By now everyone at the table had stopped talking and was listening to us. The facilitator gave me a furious look, then turned to the other man and asked him a question, but everyone ignored her.

I looked at the women one by one as I spoke. “Please don’t take this the wrong way, but have any of you ever engaged in physical activity with the idea that you would be compensated somehow, even if the compensation was not explicitly stated?”

“Define compensation.” Kaitlin sat up and joined the conversation.

“A place to spend the night, a ride, cash, a gift, a promotion, a plum work assignment.”

“By those definitions, yes. I slept with a partner once to get ahead. I was young, stupid, and it did not work. But yes, just the once.” I noticed that Kaitlin was drinking a pinkish concoction and that her glass was more than half full. Teresa and Janet traded glances and remained silent.

Janet took a long pull on her drink and set it back on the table. She folded her arms over her chest and looked over at me. “Convenience, reliability, and leaving afterwards I can comprehend. But you also said that you see hookers because of honesty. What did you mean by that? Obviously not that she is ‘transparent’ about herself, since you are seeing all you wish to see of her already.”

I looked in my glass at the last of the Remy. “I’m attracted to her physically, and that is what I want, a physical experience. She wants the cash. I know it. So we work out an agreeable price and enjoy each other. Then it is over. Besides, it costs not much more than dinner and a show.”

At this last, Teresa and Janet collectively made a noise somewhere between a groan and a yelp, rolled their eyes, and sat back in their seats, both of them now with their arms crossed over their chests. The other man was looking around for the waiter, and spotting him, made a tracing motion with his finger to order another round.

Kaitlin had pulled the straws out of her drink and was trying to fit the tip of one into the end of the other. “Have you ever slept with someone and promised them a promotion or a raise?” she asked, not looking up.

“Never,” I replied, shaking my head for emphasis even though I knew she wouldn’t see it.

Kaitlin pivoted in her seat to face the other man. “So, have you ever paid for sex?” she demanded.

“Uhm. Ahh.” The other man turned red and began to look around for the waiter. “Well. S-s-sort of,” he finally stammered.

“Are all men like this?” Teresa exploded. “Aren’t there any decent men left? My ex used to get massages. It was a long time until I figured out why.”

I put my palms on the table and spread my fingers out over the tablecloth. “You asked a question, I answered honestly.” The waiter had returned with a tray full of drinks. “Now it’s your turn. Did you ever cheat on your husband? Be honest, now.” The facilitator looked sharply at me, her face ashen.

“Never,” Teresa said with more than a trace of smug superiority.

“Never kissed another man?”

“Of course, but that is not cheating.”

The waiter hesitated slightly, and then continued to distribute the drinks. He put the tray down, and slowly and carefully began to collect the old glasses and wipe the table.

“Did you ever kiss another man with intent?”

“’Intent’? What do you mean, ‘intent’?”

I downed the last of my Remy and handed the empty glass to the waiter. “Intent to excite physical passion.”

Teresa hesitated. “I’m…I’m not sure.”

“Has another man ever touched you in a sexual manner, not intercourse, just in a sexual manner?”

“I did not do anything like that.” Teresa had found her footing again.

“Never? I find it hard to believe that you have never been confronted with a sexual situation outside of your primary relationship.”

The facilitator tried to speak again, stopped, and buried her head in her hands.

Janet, who had been in the middle of another sip of her drink, hummed an assent as she swallowed. “I faced that once. We were all but naked. Except I could not go through with it. I stopped, and fortunately, he accepted the situation with good grace.”

The waiter had run out of things to do at the table, and seemed to be idly flipping through his notebook. I paused and looked at him, and he self-consciously collected his tray and wandered away. I turned back to Janet. “Did you ever discuss this with your Significant Other?”

“No. I couldn’t.”

“Why did you stop?” I glanced over at Kaitlin, who was still fiddling with the straws.

“I don’t know. I wanted it very much. But I could not go through with it. I just could not take the last step. I was actually crying with frustration.” Janet shook her head at the memory. “I think that is why my friend took it so well, because of the crying, that is.”

“I had an affair.” Kaitlin had come back to life, and everyone looked at her. “My ex was having one. I was lonely. I missed sex, and I missed feeling good after sex even more. It was fun in the beginning, but it quickly became just another chore. I think it lasted all of three weeks. But I could have stopped before it started, if I had wanted to, and almost did. So I know what you mean.” Kaitlin pulled the straws from her new drink and began inserting them into the others. “So, wise guy,” she said, eyeing me sardonically. “Did you ever have an affair?”

“No. I have dated two women at the same time. But not an ‘affair’.”

“Semantics. Two women at the same time is having an affair.” Teresa seemed pleased with her role as the moral arbiter of the group.

I took a sip of Remy and made a face. “I don’t feel that way. I was not in a committed relationship, so it can’t be an affair.”

“Did you ever touch a woman with intent?” Teresa leaned on her forearms to bore in on me.

“Guilty. But nothing became of it. A little bit of flirting that got out of hand.”

“So when does it become an affair? When it is it just flirting?”

I sighed, thought for a moment, and then answered. “I’m not sure. But I would think that any oral/genital contact, penetration, or even mutual masturbation would qualify as an affair. A little touching and kissing would not cross the line. But others may disagree.” I looked over at Janet, but it was Teresa who spoke instead.

“Would hookers count?”

“Of course. Why do you even ask? Is a hooker somehow easier to take than an affair with the next door neighbor?”

“I thought you would say it doesn’t count.” Teresa looked disappointed.

“I think an affair is worse.” Janet had finished most of her drink and looked relaxed for the first time since the evening had started. “To know that my man was spending emotional energy on another person would be harder for me to tolerate. A hooker is money, and an affair is emotions. I think that is a big difference.” She poked at the ice in her glass with a straw, trying to tease out more liquid.

Teresa waved her hand dismissively. “It doesn’t matter. Cheating is cheating…period. Besides,” she said, turning to me, “Hookers have diseases. How can you risk it?”

“Safe sex. Without exception. In fact…” I paused, considered what I was going to say for a moment, then continued. “I think girlfriends are a bigger risk, as one is tempted to engage in risky behavior – sex without condoms.”

The rest of the group fell silent as they considered this point of view. The facilitator, seeing an opening, tried to revive an earlier conversation during dinner about the war in Iraq, but Teresa interrupted as if she wasn’t there.

“Do you like hookers because you can get anal sex?”

The other man at the table grinned happily, looking back and forth between Teresa and me.

I inhaled deeply from the snifter before answering. “Sorry to disappoint you, but hookers are no different than regular folks. Some do it, many don’t. But there is something liberating about not having to worry about your lover. One can concentrate on one’s own pleasure. One does not have to worry if she will respect you in the morning or think you are a pervert. With a lover, it is sometimes difficult to get to that level of intimacy and acceptance…at least for me. It seems odd, but one can be liberated with a hooker instantly in a way that takes great amount of time with a lover.”

Teresa was looking at me skeptically, and her arms remained folded across her chest. “Is that a nice way to say ‘yes’?”

I sipped cognac. “Alright. Yes, I have had anal sex with hookers. I have, for the record, had anal sex with several different lovers over the years. It is not something that I demand. But if the woman enjoys it, and I can pleasure her in that way, I will.”

“It is never pleasurable to a woman. That’s a male fantasy perpetuated by pornography.”

I glanced around the table. “Anyone else care to comment?”

There was another pause and another chance to redirect the conversation, but the facilitator had finally given up, and there was only silence.

Janet cleared her throat. “I tried it with my ex. It did not go so well. He was too big.”

“Apparently that is not one of my failings,” I said ruefully.

All eyes at the table turned towards Kaitlin.

She was slouching again and picking at the end of one of the straws. “Well, it can be fun, but only with someone that I trust and love deeply. I can enjoy that.”.

“I don’t believe it,” Teresa huffed, and took refuge in her drink.

“Well, I’m not Wilt Chamberlain, but I have had lovers that really enjoyed anal sex.” I glanced at the facilitator, who was ignoring the conversation now, leaning back and looking at something on the ceiling “They are a minority, but they do exist,” I added.

Teresa wasn’t buying it. “You just said you aren’t an expert. How do you know they enjoyed it?”

“They said so. Have you ever tried it?”

“Never,” Teresa said. The smug tone had reappeared.

“You might try something before knocking it.”

Teresa gave me what she hoped was a withering look. “I know enough to know that is not something that I would like.”

In spite of the mellowing effects of the cognac, I found myself increasingly irritated with Teresa. “Good. A woman should know her limits.”

And with this last, the conversation faltered. As if on cue, the waiter approached the table and dropped off a leather booklet with the check; the facilitator caught it on the first bounce. Everyone took the hint and stood to leave. As they gathered up their coats, Kaitlin edged her way over to me. “That was the most fun I have ever had at one of these events.” I looked at her with surprise, and renewed optimism, but then she continued: “At first I thought you were a jerk. Now I don’t think you are a jerk anymore. I might not want to date you, but you do know how to keep a conversation interesting.”

For the first time all evening, I found myself at a loss for words. Kaitlin had been a possibility; this was indeed a shame.

Everyone shook hands and said goodbye and thanked each other for the pleasant evening. Then the facilitator drew me aside and offered to refund my money, suggesting that I not contact the agency again. I decided not to tell her that this would be easy, since I did not contact them in the first place.

I repaired to the restroom for much-needed relief. As I stood waiting for my bladder to empty, I mentally replayed the conversation with Teresa. The moral of the story, I decided, was this: Women demand honesty from a man because they associate honesty with respect; not because they want to talk about strippers, hookers, and anal sex at the dinner table.

I shook myself dry and washed my hands. I wondered how I would explain the evening to my friends, and hoped that they would get their money back. Pushing my way through the bathroom door, I turned and headed towards the lobby.

Teresa was standing there, holding her coat. She looked at me for a few moments, and I looked at her, and she didn’t look away.

Posted in Fun, Your Stories8 Comments

Enter your email address: